Our cultural hegemony, or rather a particular aspect of it, is designed to dissuade Marxists from doing the most impactful thing they can do at this stage in the class struggle: bring anti-imperialist ideas to the people by any means necessary. This is the part of the cultural hegemony that exists specifically within the modern […]
Those who understand the volatile nature of the anarchy of production; and how this volatility brings more destruction the further along capitalism is in its decay; know that a disruption is coming to our economy which will be larger than the one from 2008. The acceleration in our living standards decline that’s been occurring throughout
The backlash to Biden’s proxy war hasn’t just invigorated the USA’s social movements; it’s prompted many of those involved in these movements to do something which has made the antiwar struggle into a genuine systemic threat for the first time in decades. What they’ve done is form a coalition among the different types of pro-Russian
What the Ukraine war has done is expose a rift between the types of Marxists who seek to bring back the successes of the 20th century American communist movement; and the types of Marxists who have faith in the insular leftist activism practice which replaced that movement. Prior to February of 2022, these two elements
The war-makers are mobilizing to bring their campaign of destruction and suffering, which has already traumatized an entire generation in Europe with the Ukraine conflict, to the North American continent. They’re aiming to invade Mexico, as is evident in how such a war effort has even stronger bipartisan support than the Ukraine proxy war does;
To understand the nature of pro-imperialist psyops in the era after the Ukraine war’s start, we need to understand what these psyops are about defending: monopoly capital. The context behind every attack against an anti-imperialist country; attempt to discredit a person or org that’s helping the anti-imperialist cause; or act of state persecution towards these
Imperialism’s narrative managers are looking for any signs they can find that this latest BRICS expansion doesn’t truly mean a loss for U.S. dominance; that the grouping and its members are too hesitant, prone to infighting, or held back by internal contradictions to be able to effectively challenge U.S. hegemony. These are the only kinds
The U.S. State Department and its narrative managers are trying to demoralize supporters of the anti-imperialist cause. They want us to see the contradictions in American hegemony’s challengers—whether these contradictions are real or perceived—and conclude that these sources of opposition towards the empire aren’t worth narratively assisting. At the moment, the main goal of this
With the failure of the sanctions to stop Russia’s economy from growing; the failure of U.S. diplomats to convince the Global South to join Washington’s war against Russia; the failure of Ukraine’s summer counteroffensive to sufficiently undo Russia’s gains; the failure of June’s Russian PMC betrayal to destabilize the country’s government; the failure to stop
How to defeat the capitalist state in a place like North America, where the two biggest countries are benefactors of neo-colonial extraction? This part of the globe is the center of modern imperialism, as well as a place where the state and its capitalist rulers carry out internal imperialism via extraction from indigenous lands. Capital
